If reading this, you may be wondering if expensive food sensitivity tests work. Are there lower cost ways to root out food sensitivities? And, perhaps, most important, what should people do with their results? There’s no reason to panic since you have definitely come to the right place.
In this simple guide, we will let you understand the different types of food sensitivity and allergy tests, together with which ones work and which ones don’t. Read on below to uncover more before deciding on anything!
Why Get a Food Sensitivity Test?
When you make the bold decision of taking up food sensitivity test, they are usually desperate to feel better. Despite giving up any number of foods, such as dairy, gluten, or even onions, their problems persist. So, when they find out more about food sensitivity tests that require only a finger prick’s worth of blood.
Most people can test for food sensitivities and intolerances at home. Even though at-home options like food journaling and elimination diets aren’t as easy as pricking your finger and sending your blood off to a lab, they are more accurate and effective.
It is common to come across individuals who refer to ‘food sensitivities’ as a catchall to describe a wide range of adverse symptoms that can be brought on by eating certain foods. Well, a food sensitivity occurs when a person has difficulty digesting a particular food. You may wonder if IgG food sensitivity testing is accurate.
With a food sensitivity testing, a lab analyzes how immunoglobulin G (IgG, an immune system antibody, reacts to roughly 100 different foods. The idea is that elevated IgG levels signal a food sensitivity. Actually, it is quite similar to the premise of food allergy blood testing, which measures a different antibody called Immunoglobulin E (IgE).
Even though IgE tests can deliver false positives, they are relatively accurate, correctly diagnosing allergies to 90 percent of the time. Well, this is how you can know if you have, say, a dairy allergy. Unlike IgE tests, IgG tests are unregulated and unproven.